← AiTimeline Home

Politics · India · Courts · Maharashtra

Bhima Koregaon & Elgar Parishad Case: A Timeline of Key Events

📅 Last updated: 27 October 2026📖 33 dated entries✎ By Nazish Fatima

View as Web Story

In short

Bhima Koregaon Elgar Parishad case timeline: the 2018 violence, 16 UAPA arrests, every bail order and the state inquiry report due by 31 October 2026.

Latest Story

The Bhima Koregaon Elgar Parishad case timeline begins with the 200th anniversary of an 1818 battle: on 31 December 2017 activists held the Elgar Parishad at Pune’s Shaniwar Wada, and on 1 January 2018 violence near the Bhima Koregaon memorial left one man dead. Two separate investigations followed: one into the violence, and an anti-terror conspiracy case alleging that the conclave was backed by Maoists, in which 16 people were arrested. As of 27 October 2026, no one has been convicted, every surviving accused has been granted bail, and the state inquiry commission’s report is due by 31 October. This page keeps the two tracks apart and links each legal step to the report that recorded it.

Vijay Stambh memorial at Bhima Koregaon, Maharashtra.
The Vijay Stambh, the 1818 battle memorial at Bhima Koregaon in Pune district. Photo: Knitin777, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.

💡 Short Answer

Violence near the Bhima Koregaon memorial on 1 January 2018 killed Rahul Phatangale. Police then built a separate case alleging the Elgar Parishad conclave of 31 December 2017 was part of a Maoist conspiracy; 16 activists, lawyers and academics were arrested under the UAPA, and the NIA took over in 2020. Stan Swamy died in custody in 2021. By 2026 every surviving accused had bail, but no trial had begun. The inquiry commission finished hearings in September 2026; its report is due by 31 October 2026.

⚡ Bhima Koregaon Case Quick Facts
Elgar Parishad31 Dec 2017, Pune
Violence1 Jan 2018; 1 killed
Arrested (UAPA)16 people, 2018-20
NIA took over24 Jan 2020
ConvictionsNone; no trial yet
Inquiry reportDue 31 Oct 2026

Two Investigations, Not One Case

Last updated: 27 October 2026. Allegations in one track are not findings in the other.

Diagram of the two separate investigations: the violence case and inquiry commission, and the Elgar Parishad conspiracy case under the NIA
Chart: two investigations, not one case. Chart by AiTimeline.
Track 1: the violenceTrack 2: the Elgar Parishad case
What it is aboutWhat happened near the memorial on 1 January 2018 and who was responsibleWhether the 31 December 2017 conclave was part of a Maoist conspiracy
Starting pointFIR of 2 January 2018 naming Sambhaji Bhide and Milind EkboteFIR of 8 January 2018 on Tushar Damgude’s complaint
Who investigatesPune rural police; separately, the state’s inquiry commissionPune Police, then the NIA from 24 January 2020
Law usedOrdinary criminal lawUnlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, added 17 May 2018
People heldEkbote arrested 14 March 2018, bailed in April; Bhide not arrested16 people arrested, June 2018 to October 2020
Where it standsCommission report due 31 October 2026; no submission foundAll surviving accused bailed; charges not framed; no trial
What a final outcome would beCommission findings (not a verdict) and any court outcomeA trial verdict, which has not begun
⚡ Quick Answers — AI Overview Ready

Bhima Koregaon and Elgar Parishad: Key Questions

What is the Bhima Koregaon Elgar Parishad case?
Two connected matters: violence near the Bhima Koregaon memorial on 1 January 2018, and a separate UAPA case alleging that the Elgar Parishad conclave in Pune the day before was backed by the banned CPI (Maoist). Sixteen people were arrested in that case.
Has anyone been convicted?
No. Charges had not been framed when the last accused got bail in May 2026, and no trial has begun. The bail orders decide custody pending trial, not guilt or innocence.
Is anyone still in jail?
Every surviving accused has bail. Surendra Gadling remained in jail as of the latest report found, because his bail plea in a separate 2016 arson case was pending in the Supreme Court. Stan Swamy died in custody in July 2021.
What is the inquiry commission’s status?
The two-member Koregaon Bhima commission finished hearings in September 2026 after 58 witnesses. Its 23rd extension runs to 31 October 2026. AiTimeline found no confirmation that the report has been submitted.
📚 Key Takeaways

The Case in Ten Points

  • History: the memorial marks a battle of 1 January 1818; Ambedkar’s 1927 visit began the annual gathering.
  • Conclave: Elgar Parishad met at Shaniwar Wada, Pune, on 31 December 2017.
  • Violence: clashes on 1 January 2018 killed Rahul Phatangale.
  • Two FIRs: 2 January named Bhide and Ekbote; 8 January targeted Elgar Parishad.
  • UAPA: added on 17 May 2018; 16 people arrested from June 2018.
  • NIA: took over the conspiracy case on 24 January 2020.
  • Stan Swamy: died in custody on 5 July 2021, aged 84.
  • Bail: granted to all surviving accused, the last on 4 May 2026.
  • No trial: charges not framed; no conviction or acquittal.
  • Inquiry: 58 witnesses, 23 extensions; report due 31 October 2026.

Bhima Koregaon and Elgar Parishad Timeline, Latest First

Each entry is tagged by track and ends with why it matters. Allegations are labelled as such.

27 Oct
2026

Where the case stands today Inquiry commission

27 Oct 2026Status checkReport due 31 Oct

The inquiry commission’s report is due by 31 October 2026, and AiTimeline found no report that it has been submitted or published. This page will be updated only when submission is confirmed. In the Elgar Parishad conspiracy case, every surviving accused has been granted bail by a court, but charges had still not been framed when Surendra Gadling got bail in May 2026, and no trial had begun (Scroll; The Quint).

Gadling remained in jail as of the last report found, because his bail plea in a separate 2016 arson case was pending in the Supreme Court. No accused has been convicted or acquitted in the conspiracy case.

Why it matters: Eight years on, neither track has produced a final finding: no inquiry report yet, and no trial verdict.
18 Sep
2026

Inquiry commission finishes hearing witnesses Inquiry commission

Report 18 Sep 202658 witnesses23rd extension, to 31 Oct

The Koregaon Bhima Commission of Inquiry concluded its hearings to record evidence, nearly eight and a half years after it was formed. Its lawyer, Ashish Satpute, said 58 witnesses had been examined, including NCP(SP) chief Sharad Pawar, VBA president Prakash Ambedkar, the then Pune police commissioner Rashmi Shukla, the then Pune rural superintendent Suvez Haque, the then district collector Saurabh Rao, and villagers from Koregaon Bhima and Vadhu Budruk. The commission had received more than 400 affidavits (The Indian Express, 18 September 2026).

A Home Department letter of 11 September gave it until 31 October 2026 to submit its report: the 23rd extension. The previous deadline was 31 August 2026. Lawyers for the parties have filed final arguments.

Why it matters: This is the track that examines the violence itself. Its findings, when they come, will not be a criminal verdict.
28 Aug
2026

Court rejects NIA plea to cancel four activists’ bail Court order

Order 28 Aug 2026Special Judge Chakor S. BaviskarReported 30 Aug

The NIA had asked a Mumbai special court to cancel the bail of Varavara Rao, Sudha Bharadwaj, Arun Ferreira and Vernon Gonsalves, saying they breached bail conditions by attending a gathering at the Mumbai Press Club on 19 January 2026 with other accused. The agency claimed the meeting was meant to propagate the ideology of the banned CPI (Maoist). Special Judge Chakor S. Baviskar rejected the applications on Friday, 28 August: the accused already met inside and outside the courtroom during hearings, and “merely because a venue of the meeting/gathering of the accused changed, they cannot be said to have committed breach of the bail condition” (Scroll; Bar and Bench).

The order concerned bail conditions only. It did not decide whether the conspiracy allegations are true.

Why it matters: A test of how far bail conditions reach: the court held that presence at a meeting, by itself, is not a breach.
4 May
2026

Surendra Gadling granted bail after nearly eight years Court order

4 May 2026Bombay High Court (Ajay Gadkari, Kamal Khata)Still held in another case

The Bombay High Court granted lawyer Surendra Gadling bail in the Elgar Parishad case on grounds of prolonged pre-trial detention, noting the trial had not begun, and on parity, since 14 of the 16 accused had already been released. The NIA opposed the plea, citing the 2016 Surjagarh mine arson case in Gadchiroli (The Quint).

He stayed in jail because his bail appeal in the arson case was pending in the Supreme Court, where three judges had recused by July 2026; on 27 July, Kapil Sibal asked Chief Justice Surya Kant’s bench to list it before another bench (LiveLaw).

Why it matters: Bail in one case does not free a person held in another.
23 Jan
2026

Sagar Gorkhe and Ramesh Gaichor granted bail Court order

23 Jan 2026Bombay High Court bench headed by A. S. GadkariParity

The High Court granted bail to the two Kabir Kala Manch artists, arrested in September 2020, on the ground of parity: other accused had been released because of long incarceration and the unlikelihood of the trial starting soon. Conditions: a bond of ₹1 lakh each and attendance at the NIA office once a month. The court said that with this order, all accused except Surendra Gadling had been granted bail (The New Indian Express).

Why it matters: Bail on parity is about consistency between accused, not a finding on the evidence.
19 Jan
2026

A gathering at the Mumbai Press Club Elgar Parishad case

19 Jan 2026Several accused attendLater cited by the NIA

Several accused attended a gathering at the Mumbai Press Club. In April the club suspended three members for having “facilitated” it, and on 1 May the NIA sought documents about it. A city civil court on 7 May stayed the expulsion of one member, Gurbir Singh, saying the action appeared aimed at preventing him from contesting club elections (Scroll).

Why it matters: The meeting became the basis of the NIA’s failed bid to send four accused back to jail.
4 Dec
2025

Hany Babu granted bail after five years Court order

4 Dec 2025Bombay High Court (A. S. Gadkari, Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale)Stay refused

The High Court granted bail to the former Delhi University professor, arrested by the NIA on 28 July 2020, and refused the agency’s request to stay the order so it could appeal, noting he had been in custody for more than five years and seven months (Onmanorama). The NIA alleges he was a member of the banned CPI (Maoist); he denies it.

Why it matters: The court refused even a short stay: time in custody weighed against further delay.
19 Nov
2025

Supreme Court gives Jyoti Jagtap interim bail Court order

19 Nov 2025Justices M. M. Sundresh, Satish Chandra SharmaInterim

Jagtap’s counsel told the court she had been in custody for more than five years. The bench granted interim bail until the next hearing in February 2026. A special court had refused her bail in February 2022, and the High Court upheld that in October 2022, saying dialogue in Kabir Kala Manch plays “incited hatred and indicated a larger conspiracy” (LiveLaw). AiTimeline did not find a report of the February 2026 hearing’s outcome.

Why it matters: Interim relief is temporary: it can be extended, made regular or withdrawn.
16 Sep
2025

Mahesh Raut gets interim medical bail Court order

16 Sep 2025Supreme CourtHC bail of 2023 still under NIA appeal

The High Court had granted Raut bail on the merits on 21 September 2023, but the Supreme Court stayed that order on the NIA’s appeal. In September 2025 a bench of Justices M. M. Sundresh and Satish Chandra Sharma gave him six weeks’ interim bail for rheumatoid arthritis, later extended to 26 November (LiveLaw). A January 2026 report describes him as out on bail; AiTimeline found no final ruling on the NIA’s appeal.

Why it matters: Raut’s case shows how a bail order can be granted and still not take effect for years.
8 Jan
2025

Rona Wilson and Sudhir Dhawale granted bail Court order

8 Jan 2025Bombay High CourtMore than 300 witnesses

Both had been in custody since June 2018. The High Court noted that charges were yet to be framed and that the prosecution had listed more than 300 witnesses (The Tribune).

Why it matters: More than six years after their arrest, the trial had not begun.
14 May
2024

Gautam Navlakha’s bail takes effect Court order

14 May 2024Supreme CourtHC bail of 19 Dec 2023

The Bombay High Court had granted Navlakha bail on 19 December 2023 and stayed its own order for the NIA to appeal. On 14 May 2024 the Supreme Court let the bail stand, saying the trial could take several years given the number of witnesses (Hindustan Times). Navlakha had surrendered on 14 April 2020 and was moved to house arrest in November 2022.

Why it matters: The Supreme Court’s reasoning, that a trial may take years, recurs in later bail orders.
5 Apr
2024

Shoma Sen granted bail by the Supreme Court Court order

5 Apr 2024Released 17 Apr 2024Arrested June 2018

The retired Nagpur University professor walked out of jail on 17 April 2024, twelve days after the Supreme Court granted her bail (Hindustan Times).

Why it matters: Another of the June 2018 arrestees released before trial.
28 Jul
2023

Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira granted bail Court order

28 Jul 2023Supreme Court (Aniruddha Bose, Sudhanshu Dhulia)Nearly five years in custody

The court said the allegations were serious but that did not mean bail could not be granted (Deccan Herald). Reports of the ruling say it described the letters relied on by the NIA as having “weak probative value or quality” (Scroll).

Why it matters: A Supreme Court bench publicly questioned the strength of the core documentary evidence at the bail stage.
18 Nov
2022

Anand Teltumbde granted bail Court order

18 Nov 2022Bombay High CourtNavlakha to house arrest, 10 Nov

The High Court granted bail to the scholar, who had surrendered on 14 April 2020. Eight days earlier, on 10 November 2022, the Supreme Court allowed Gautam Navlakha to be moved from jail to house arrest (Hindustan Times).

Why it matters: One of the first accused to win bail on the merits from the High Court.
1 Dec
2021

Sudha Bharadwaj granted default bail Court order

1 Dec 2021Bombay High CourtStatutory default bail

The High Court granted the lawyer default bail, a statutory right that arises when a chargesheet is not filed within the time allowed; it did not assess the evidence (Scroll; Hindustan Times). Varavara Rao, 85, had been granted medical bail by the same court on 22 February 2021; the Supreme Court confirmed his medical bail in August 2022.

Why it matters: Default bail turns on procedure, not on the strength of the case.
5 Jul
2021

Father Stan Swamy dies in custody Court order

5 Jul 2021Age 84Arrested 8 Oct 2020, Ranchi

The Jesuit priest and tribal-rights activist, arrested by the NIA in Ranchi on 8 October 2020, died in a Mumbai hospital, where he had been moved from Taloja jail; on 28 May 2021 the High Court had directed his hospitalisation (Hindustan Times; The News Minute). He denied the allegations. He died before trial, so there was no conviction.

Why it matters: His death made the case a byword for the treatment of elderly undertrials.
Bar chart of years each of the 16 Elgar Parishad accused spent in custody before bail, from 7.9 years for Surendra Gadling to 0.7 years for Stan Swamy, who died in custody
Chart: years in custody before bail for all 16 accused. Chart by AiTimeline from court reports. Bail is not a verdict.

Defence-commissioned forensic report alleges planted files Elgar Parishad case

Feb 2021Arsenal ConsultingDisputed by the prosecution

Arsenal Consulting, a US digital forensics firm, concluded that files had been planted on the laptops and devices of accused persons (Scroll). The report was commissioned by the defence; the NIA has not accepted it, and no court has ruled on it.

Why it matters: The question of how the letters got onto the devices remains contested and untested at trial.

Kabir Kala Manch artists and Stan Swamy arrested Elgar Parishad case

Sep 2020: Gorkhe, Gaichor, Jagtap28 Jul 2020: Hany Babu8 Oct: Swamy

The NIA arrested Kabir Kala Manch members Sagar Gorkhe, Ramesh Gaichor and Jyoti Jagtap in September 2020, after Hany Babu in July. It alleged the cultural group was linked to the banned CPI (Maoist); the accused deny it (The New Indian Express; Hindustan Times).

Why it matters: With these arrests, 16 people had been arrested in the conspiracy case.
24 Jan
2020

NIA takes over the Elgar Parishad case Elgar Parishad case

24 Jan 2020Union governmentTeltumbde, Navlakha surrender 14 Apr

The case was transferred from Pune Police to the National Investigation Agency weeks after a new Shiv Sena-NCP-Congress government took office in Maharashtra (Hindustan Times; The News Minute). Anand Teltumbde and Gautam Navlakha surrendered on 14 April 2020 after the Supreme Court refused to extend their protection from arrest.

The NIA took over the conspiracy case. The violence investigation and the inquiry commission were separate and stayed with the state.

Why it matters: From here the conspiracy case was a central agency’s prosecution under the UAPA.
15 Nov
2018

Pune Police file the first chargesheet Elgar Parishad case

15 Nov 2018Pune PoliceConspiracy case

Pune Police filed the first chargesheet in the Elgar Parishad case (Hindustan Times). Between late October and November 2018, Arun Ferreira, Vernon Gonsalves, Sudha Bharadwaj and Varavara Rao were taken into custody after their house arrest ended.

Why it matters: The prosecution case was on paper; the arguments over its evidence would take years.
28 Sep
2018

Supreme Court declines an independent probe, 2 to 1 Court order

28 Sep 2018Romila Thapar and others v. Union of IndiaDissent by one judge

Historian Romila Thapar, economist Prabhat Patnaik and others had moved the Court on 29 August 2018, which placed the five arrested activists under house arrest. On 28 September a majority of the bench refused to interfere with the arrests or appoint a special investigation team (The News Minute).

Why it matters: An early test of whether courts would scrutinise the investigation itself; the majority said no.
28 Aug
2018

Second round: five more activists Elgar Parishad case

28 Aug 2018Raids in several citiesHouse arrest from 29 Aug

Police raided homes in several cities and arrested lawyer Sudha Bharadwaj, activists Arun Ferreira, Vernon Gonsalves and Gautam Navlakha, and the Telugu poet Varavara Rao (Hindustan Times; The News Minute). The Supreme Court converted their arrest into house arrest the next day.

Why it matters: The case moved from Pune activists to nationally known figures.
6 Jun
2018

First arrests under the UAPA Elgar Parishad case

6 Jun 2018Pune PoliceFive arrested

Pune Police arrested Sudhir Dhawale, Surendra Gadling, Mahesh Raut, Shoma Sen and Rona Wilson (Hindustan Times; The News Minute). Police alleged links to the CPI (Maoist) and, citing a letter found in electronic evidence, a plot against the Prime Minister. The accused denied the allegations.

Why it matters: These arrests turned a riot inquiry into an anti-terror case.
17 May
2018

UAPA sections added Elgar Parishad case

17 May 2018Elgar Parishad FIRAfter 17 April searches

Police added sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, saying they had collected incriminating documents in searches on 17 April at the homes of Rona Wilson in Delhi, Sudhir Dhawale in Mumbai and others (Hindustan Times).

Why it matters: The UAPA makes bail far harder to get, which shaped everything that followed.
14 Mar
2018

Milind Ekbote arrested in the violence case Violence case

14 Mar 2018Pune rural policeBail in April

Ekbote, named in the 2 January FIR, was arrested after the Supreme Court rejected his anticipatory bail plea, and was granted bail by a Pune sessions court in April 2018 (Scroll). Sambhaji Bhide, named in the same FIR, was not arrested.

Why it matters: The violence case and its accused followed a different path from the conspiracy case.
9 Feb
2018

Maharashtra sets up an inquiry commission Inquiry commission

9 Feb 2018Justice J. N. Patel, Sumit MullickOriginal term: four months

The state formed a two-member commission headed by retired Calcutta High Court Chief Justice J. N. Patel, with former chief secretary Sumit Mullick, to inquire into the “exact sequence” of events that led to the violence. It was first given four months (The Indian Express).

Why it matters: It would need 23 extensions and more than eight years.
8 Jan
2018

Second FIR targets Elgar Parishad Elgar Parishad case

8 Jan 2018Complaint by Tushar DamgudeBecomes the conspiracy case

On Tushar Damgude’s complaint, police registered a case alleging that Maoists and Kabir Kala Manch spread hatred through songs, plays and speeches at Elgar Parishad that led to the violence (Hindustan Times). This FIR grew into the Elgar Parishad conspiracy case.

Why it matters: The start of track two: an allegation about the conclave, not about who threw stones on 1 January.
2 Jan
2018

First FIR names Bhide and Ekbote Violence case

2 Jan 2018Violence caseAllegation

Police registered a case alleging the involvement of Sambhaji Bhide, a former RSS worker, and his associate Milind Ekbote in the violence (Hindustan Times). An FIR records an allegation; it is not proof of guilt.

Why it matters: The start of track one: the investigation into the violence itself.
1 Jan
2018

Violence near the memorial on the bicentenary Violence case

1 Jan 2018Koregaon Bhima, SanaswadiOne dead

Clashes broke out as lakhs of Ambedkarites gathered to mark the battle’s 200th anniversary. Rahul Phatangale, 28, was killed; his family said he was not involved in Elgar Parishad. During a statewide bandh called by Prakash Ambedkar the next days, a 16-year-old Dalit boy died, allegedly after a police caning (The News Minute; The Indian Express).

Who was responsible is still contested. One side before the commission blamed Hindutva leaders Ekbote and Bhide; the other alleged the Elgar Parishad organisers instigated the violence.

Why it matters: One death and competing accounts that two investigations would pull in different directions.
Crowds and garlands at the Vijay Stambh, Bhima Koregaon, during the 1 January commemoration
Crowds at the Vijay Stambh during a 1 January commemoration. Photo: Sam675nice, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.
31 Dec
2017

Elgar Parishad held at Shaniwar Wada Elgar Parishad case

31 Dec 2017Pune250+ groups, 30,000-35,000 people

A coalition of more than 250 Dalit and other groups held the Elgar Parishad at Shaniwar Wada, the former Peshwa seat in Pune, to mark the bicentenary, with speeches and cultural performances. Speakers included Prakash Ambedkar, Jignesh Mevani and Umar Khalid (The News Minute; The Indian Express). Police later alleged the conclave was backed by Maoists; organisers deny it.

Why it matters: The event at the centre of the conspiracy case.
Entrance of Shaniwar Wada in Pune, venue of the Elgar Parishad on 31 December 2017
Shaniwar Wada, Pune, where the Elgar Parishad was held on 31 December 2017. Photo: Aakash.gautam, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.
28–29 Dec
2017

A dispute over a memorial board in Vadhu Budruk Violence case

Night of 28-29 Dec 2017Vadhu Budruk, 3 km awaySeen as a trigger

A board giving the Mahar community’s account of Govind Gopal, whom it credits with performing the last rites of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj in 1689, was put up in Vadhu Budruk and led to an altercation. Marathas in the village credit the Shivale Deshmukhs instead. The dispute is seen as one trigger of the 1 January violence (The Indian Express).

Why it matters: A local dispute over history, days before the bicentenary.
1 Jan
1927

B. R. Ambedkar visits the memorial History

1 Jan 1927Start of the annual gathering

Dr B. R. Ambedkar’s visit to the memorial began the tradition of Dalit groups commemorating the Mahar soldiers there every 1 January (Hindustan Times).

Why it matters: Why lakhs gather at the pillar every New Year’s Day.
1 Jan
1818

The Battle of Koregaon History

1 Jan 1818Third Anglo-Maratha War~800 vs a much larger Peshwa army

A small East India Company force of about 800, which included many Mahar soldiers, held off a far larger army of Peshwa Baji Rao II at Koregaon on the Bhima river; the Peshwa’s army is often put at 28,000 in total, of which a part attacked (The News Minute; Wikipedia). The Company later raised an obelisk, the Vijay Stambh, at the site.

For many Ambedkarites the battle stands for resistance to caste oppression under the Peshwas; historians also place it within the expansion of British colonial rule.

Why it matters: The memory behind the memorial is itself contested, and that contest is part of the story.
1843 engraving of the column at Corygaum, the Koregaon battle memorial
The column at “Corygaum”, as engraved in 1843. Public domain, Wikimedia Commons.

Every Bail Order in the Elgar Parishad Case

Fourteen orders over five years, each linked to the report that recorded it. Each is an individual decision, not a collective verdict.

DateAccusedCourtType of orderSource
22 Feb 2021Varavara RaoBombay High CourtMedical bail; SC confirmed Aug 2022HT
1 Dec 2021Sudha BharadwajBombay High CourtDefault bail (no chargesheet in time)Scroll
18 Nov 2022Anand TeltumbdeBombay High CourtRegular bailHT
28 Jul 2023Vernon Gonsalves, Arun FerreiraSupreme CourtRegular bailDeccan Herald
21 Sep 2023Mahesh RautBombay High CourtBail, stayed by SC on NIA appealLiveLaw
5 Apr 2024Shoma SenSupreme CourtRegular bailHT
14 May 2024Gautam NavlakhaSupreme CourtHC bail of Dec 2023 allowed to standHT
8 Jan 2025Rona Wilson, Sudhir DhawaleBombay High CourtRegular bailTribune
16 Sep 2025Mahesh RautSupreme CourtInterim medical bailLiveLaw
19 Nov 2025Jyoti JagtapSupreme CourtInterim bailLiveLaw
4 Dec 2025Hany BabuBombay High CourtRegular bail; stay refusedOnmanorama
23 Jan 2026Sagar Gorkhe, Ramesh GaichorBombay High CourtBail on parityTNIE
4 May 2026Surendra GadlingBombay High CourtBail; still held in another caseThe Quint
28 Aug 2026Rao, Bharadwaj, Ferreira, GonsalvesSpecial NIA court, MumbaiNIA plea to cancel bail rejectedBar and Bench

The Koregaon Bhima Commission of Inquiry

A fact-finding body, separate from the criminal courts.

Maharashtra set up the commission on 9 February 2018 to establish the “exact sequence” of events that led to the violence and to suggest how such incidents can be prevented. It was given four months. It invited affidavits, received more than 400, and heard witnesses in Mumbai and Pune a few days each month, with lawyers for every party allowed to cross-examine. It could not function during the Covid-19 outbreak (The Indian Express).

Two broad sides appeared before it: one blaming Hindutva leaders Milind Ekbote and Sambhaji Bhide, the other alleging that the Elgar Parishad organisers instigated the violence. The commission’s report, when it comes, will be advisory. It will not convict or acquit anyone, and it is separate from the NIA’s prosecution. This section will be updated only when the report is confirmed as submitted or published.

Timeline bar of the Koregaon Bhima inquiry commission from 9 February 2018 to its 31 October 2026 report deadline
Chart: the inquiry commission from 9 February 2018 to its 31 October 2026 deadline. Chart by AiTimeline from The Indian Express.

What Is Settled and What Is Open, as of 27 October 2026

Court orders, allegations and reports are different kinds of evidence.

QuestionWhat the sources showStatus
Did the inquiry commission submit its report?Hearings ended Sep 2026; deadline 31 Oct 2026; no submission report foundPending
Has anyone been convicted in the Elgar Parishad case?Charges not framed by May 2026; no trialNo
Are all accused free?All surviving accused bailed; Gadling held in a separate arson caseAll but one
Who caused the 1 January violence?Contested before the commission; no court or commission finding yetOpen
Were files planted on the accused’s devices?Defence-commissioned forensic report says yes; NIA disputes; no court rulingDisputed
Were the letters strong evidence?Supreme Court bail order (2023) called them of weak probative value; not a trial findingBail-stage view
Outcome of Jagtap’s February 2026 hearingNo report foundNot verified
NIA appeal against Mahesh Raut’s 2023 bailNo final ruling foundNot verified

Key People in the Case

Lawyer

Surendra Gadling

Arrested 6 June 2018; bail 4 May 2026 after nearly eight years; held in a separate 2016 arson case.

Priest, activist

Stan Swamy

Arrested 8 October 2020 at 83; died in custody on 5 July 2021 before trial.

Lawyer, trade unionist

Sudha Bharadwaj

Arrested 2018; default bail 1 December 2021.

Poet

Varavara Rao

Arrested 2018; medical bail February 2021, confirmed by the Supreme Court in August 2022.

Inquiry chair

Justice J. N. Patel

Retired Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court; heads the commission with Sumit Mullick.

Named in first FIR

Sambhaji Bhide, Milind Ekbote

Accused in the violence FIR of 2 January 2018; Ekbote was arrested and bailed in 2018.

Common Claims vs the Record

Common claimWhat the record shows
The Bhima Koregaon case is one caseThere are two tracks: the violence case (with an inquiry commission) and the Elgar Parishad conspiracy case
The accused were convictedNo trial has begun; charges had not been framed as of May 2026
Bail means the court found them innocentBail decides custody pending trial, not guilt
The inquiry report is outIts deadline is 31 October 2026; no submission had been reported by 27 October
The Supreme Court granted Navlakha bailThe High Court granted bail in December 2023; the Supreme Court let it stand in May 2024
Elgar Parishad was a banned groupIt was a one-day conclave; the banned group named by police is the CPI (Maoist)

Why the Case Matters

History and caste identity. The Vijay Stambh is more than a battlefield marker. For many Ambedkarites it stands for Mahar soldiers’ resistance to caste oppression under the Peshwas, while others stress that the battle was part of the expansion of British rule. The bicentenary brought those readings into a charged public setting, days after a local dispute over history in Vadhu Budruk.

Anti-terror law and detention before trial. Under the UAPA, bail is hard to get. Accused people in this case spent between about two and eight years in custody before bail, and courts repeatedly cited the likely length of the trial when granting it. The Supreme Court’s 2023 remark on the “weak probative value” of the letters, and a defence-commissioned forensic report alleging planted files, are part of a debate that only a trial can settle.

Separating evidence from allegation. FIRs, police claims, complainants’ accounts, bail orders and commission findings are different categories. None of them, on its own, is a verdict.

Explore More Timelines

People Also Ask

Why do people visit Bhima Koregaon on 1 January?
To mark the 1818 battle at the Vijay Stambh. The annual gathering began after B. R. Ambedkar visited on 1 January 1927 and draws lakhs of Ambedkarites each year.
Is Elgar Parishad banned?
No. Elgar Parishad was a one-day event, not an organisation. The banned group in the case is the CPI (Maoist), which police allege backed the event; organisers deny it.
Who died in the Bhima Koregaon violence?
Rahul Phatangale, 28, was killed on 1 January 2018. A 16-year-old Dalit boy died during the bandh that followed, allegedly after a police caning.
What does Elgar mean?
Elgar, also spelt Elgaar, is a Marathi word for a loud call or declaration, which is how organisers described the conclave.
Where is Bhima Koregaon?
In Pune district, Maharashtra, on the Pune-Ahmednagar road about 30 km north-east of Pune city. The memorial stands at Perne, near Koregaon Bhima village.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Bhima Koregaon Elgar Parishad case?
It covers two connected matters: the violence near the Bhima Koregaon memorial in Pune district on 1 January 2018, and a separate conspiracy case alleging that the Elgar Parishad conclave in Pune the day before was backed by the banned CPI (Maoist). Sixteen people were arrested in the conspiracy case.
What happened at Bhima Koregaon on 1 January 2018?
Clashes broke out as lakhs of people gathered at the memorial for the 200th anniversary of the 1818 battle. Rahul Phatangale, 28, was killed and several people were injured. Who was responsible is still contested.
What was Elgar Parishad?
A conclave held at Shaniwar Wada in Pune on 31 December 2017 by a coalition of more than 250 Dalit and other groups to mark the bicentenary, with speeches and cultural performances. Police later alleged it was backed by Maoists; organisers deny this.
Are the violence case and the Elgar Parishad case the same?
No. The first FIR, on 2 January 2018, concerned the violence and named Sambhaji Bhide and Milind Ekbote. The second, on 8 January, concerned Elgar Parishad and became the conspiracy case taken over by the NIA in 2020.
Who was arrested in the Elgar Parishad case?
Sixteen people: Sudhir Dhawale, Surendra Gadling, Mahesh Raut, Shoma Sen, Rona Wilson, Sudha Bharadwaj, Arun Ferreira, Vernon Gonsalves, Varavara Rao, Anand Teltumbde, Gautam Navlakha, Hany Babu, Sagar Gorkhe, Ramesh Gaichor, Jyoti Jagtap and Stan Swamy.
Has anyone been convicted in the Elgar Parishad case?
No. As of October 2026 charges had not been framed and no trial had begun, as far as AiTimeline found. Bail orders are not verdicts on guilt or innocence.
Are all the accused out on bail?
Every surviving accused has been granted bail by a court. Surendra Gadling, granted bail on 4 May 2026, stayed in jail because his bail plea in a separate 2016 arson case was pending in the Supreme Court. Stan Swamy died in custody in 2021.
When did the NIA take over the case?
On 24 January 2020, when the Elgar Parishad case was transferred from Pune Police to the National Investigation Agency.
Why was the UAPA used?
Police added sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act on 17 May 2018, saying documents seized in April searches showed links to the banned CPI (Maoist). The accused deny the allegations. The UAPA makes bail much harder to obtain.
How did Stan Swamy die?
The 84-year-old Jesuit priest, arrested on 8 October 2020, died in a Mumbai hospital on 5 July 2021 while in custody, after the High Court had directed his hospitalisation in May. He died before trial, so there was no conviction.
What did the court decide on 28 August 2026?
Special Judge Chakor S. Baviskar rejected the NIA’s plea to cancel the bail of Varavara Rao, Sudha Bharadwaj, Arun Ferreira and Vernon Gonsalves over a 19 January 2026 gathering at the Mumbai Press Club. He held that meeting in a different venue was not by itself a breach of bail conditions.
What is the Koregaon Bhima Commission of Inquiry?
A two-member commission formed by Maharashtra on 9 February 2018, headed by retired Calcutta High Court Chief Justice J. N. Patel with former chief secretary Sumit Mullick, to inquire into the exact sequence of events that led to the violence.
Has the inquiry commission submitted its report?
Not as far as AiTimeline found by 27 October 2026. It concluded witness hearings in September 2026, after examining 58 witnesses, and has until 31 October 2026 under its 23rd extension. A deadline is not confirmation of submission.
Who testified before the commission?
Its lawyer said 58 witnesses were examined, including Sharad Pawar, Prakash Ambedkar, then Pune police commissioner Rashmi Shukla, then Pune rural superintendent Suvez Haque, then collector Saurabh Rao, and villagers from Koregaon Bhima and Vadhu Budruk.
Is the commission’s report a court verdict?
No. An inquiry commission’s findings can add to the public record, but they are separate from the criminal process and do not convict or acquit anyone.
Who are Sambhaji Bhide and Milind Ekbote?
Hindutva leaders named in the first FIR of 2 January 2018 alleging involvement in the violence. Ekbote was arrested on 14 March 2018 and got bail in April; Bhide was not arrested. The allegations have not been proved in court.
What did the Supreme Court say about the evidence?
When it granted bail to Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 July 2023, reports say the bench found the letters relied on by the NIA to be of weak probative value. That was a bail-stage view, not a trial finding.
What is the Arsenal Consulting report?
A 2021 analysis by a US digital forensics firm, commissioned by the defence, which concluded that files had been planted on devices of accused persons. The prosecution has not accepted it, and no court has ruled on it.
Why did Gautam Navlakha get bail?
The High Court granted him bail on 19 December 2023, and on 14 May 2024 the Supreme Court let it stand, observing that the trial could take several years given the number of witnesses.
What is default bail, as given to Sudha Bharadwaj?
A statutory right to bail when the investigating agency fails to file a chargesheet within the time the law allows. The High Court granted it to Bharadwaj on 1 December 2021; it does not assess the evidence.
What was the Battle of Koregaon?
A battle on 1 January 1818 in the Third Anglo-Maratha War, in which a small East India Company force that included many Mahar soldiers held off a much larger army of Peshwa Baji Rao II at Koregaon on the Bhima river.
What is the Vijay Stambh?
The obelisk the East India Company raised at Koregaon to commemorate the 1818 battle. Since B. R. Ambedkar visited on 1 January 1927, Ambedkarites have gathered there every New Year’s Day.
Why is the memorial’s history contested?
Many Ambedkarites see the battle as Mahar soldiers’ resistance to caste oppression under the Peshwas. Others stress that it was part of the expansion of British colonial power. Both readings appear in public debate.
What was the Vadhu Budruk dispute?
On the night of 28 to 29 December 2017 a board giving the Mahar community’s account of who performed Sambhaji Maharaj’s last rites was put up in Vadhu Budruk, about 3 km from Koregaon Bhima, and led to an altercation. It is seen as one trigger of the violence.
How long have the accused spent in custody?
Between about two and eight years before bail. Surendra Gadling spent nearly eight years before his May 2026 bail, while Varavara Rao got medical bail in about two years and three months.
What happened with the Supreme Court’s 2018 Romila Thapar case?
Historian Romila Thapar and others challenged the August 2018 arrests. The Court placed the activists under house arrest but on 28 September 2018 refused, by a majority of 2 to 1, to interfere or order an independent probe.
Who are the Kabir Kala Manch accused?
Sagar Gorkhe, Ramesh Gaichor and Jyoti Jagtap, members of a Pune cultural troupe arrested by the NIA in September 2020. Gorkhe and Gaichor got High Court bail on 23 January 2026; Jagtap got interim bail from the Supreme Court on 19 November 2025.
When was Hany Babu granted bail?
On 4 December 2025, by a Bombay High Court bench that also refused the NIA’s request to stay the order. He had been in custody since 28 July 2020.
Why is the case controversial?
It combines caste-related violence, contested history, allegations against people named in two separate investigations, the use of anti-terror law against lawyers and academics, disputed digital evidence and years of detention without trial.
Will this page be updated?
Yes. The inquiry section will be updated only once the commission’s report is confirmed as submitted or published, and the case section when a court frames charges or rules on pending appeals.

Eight Years, No Verdict

The Bhima Koregaon–Elgar Parishad case links a contested historical memory to a day of violence, two separate investigations, years of detention under anti-terror law and an inquiry that has run more than eight years past its four-month mandate. As of 27 October 2026, the inquiry report is imminent but not confirmed, the conspiracy case has no trial, and the bail orders, however many, decide nothing about guilt.

Related AiTimeline Stories

⚠️ Editorial Note

Last updated 27 October 2026. This is an explainer, not legal advice. Every accused in the Elgar Parishad case denies the allegations, and no court has ruled on them at trial. The source brief was corrected on several points: the bail-cancellation order was passed on 28 August 2026 (Bar and Bench reported it on 30 August); the commission’s second member is Sumit Mullick; the Scroll link the brief gave for the July 2023 bail is a 2026 report; Gautam Navlakha’s bail was granted by the High Court in December 2023 and allowed to stand by the Supreme Court in May 2024; and an undated “25 August 2025” entry with no source was dropped. Surendra Gadling’s bail is sourced to The Quint and Scroll instead of an aggregator. The brief omitted Anand Teltumbde, Hany Babu, Shoma Sen, Rona Wilson, Sudhir Dhawale and Mahesh Raut’s bail orders, the January 2026 Press Club gathering, the 2018 Supreme Court challenge, Milind Ekbote’s arrest, the Vadhu Budruk dispute and the 23 extensions; these are now included. Not verified: the outcome of Jyoti Jagtap’s February 2026 hearing and of the NIA’s appeal against Mahesh Raut’s 2023 bail. Some arrest dates in the custody chart are taken from contemporaneous reports and are approximate. Photographs are from Wikimedia Commons under the licences shown; no photographs of the accused are used.

China’s Export Boom vs. Consumer Struggle: A Timeline Lula Wins 2026 Brazil Presidency: Historic Fourth Term
→
Next Article